Boeing 767-300ER History and Development: From Program Launch to Long Range Icon
The Boeing 767-300ER (Extended Range) is a wide body twinjet airliner produced by Boeing Commercial Airplanes at its Everett, Washington facility. It represents the most commercially successful member of the 767 family, combining the stretched fuselage of the 767-300 with significantly enhanced range and payload capability. Understanding how and why this variant came to exist requires a look at the broader 767 programme and the regulatory changes that reshaped commercial aviation in the 1980s.
Boeing formally launched the 767 programme in July 1978 with an initial order for 30 aircraft from United Airlines. The concept grew out of the 7X7 studies that began in the early 1970s, aimed at filling a market gap between narrow body jets and the large wide body trijets of the era, such as the Lockheed L-1011 and McDonnell Douglas DC-10. Boeing chose a twin engine, wide body configuration optimised for fuel efficiency on medium to long haul routes. The prototype completed its first flight on 26 September 1981, and United Airlines placed the 767-200 into revenue service in August 1982.
Boeing began offering the stretched 767-300 in February 1983, with Japan Airlines as the launch customer. The 767-300 added a 6.4 metre (21.1 ft) fuselage stretch forward and aft of the wing, increasing passenger capacity by approximately 20% over the 767-200. The 767-300 completed its first flight on 30 January 1986 and entered service in October 1986. While the stretch addressed seat capacity, airlines operating transatlantic and intercontinental routes required greater range and higher takeoff weights.
The 767-300ER made its first flight on 9 December 1986, even before the first firm order had been placed. American Airlines signed the launch order in March 1987, and the variant received FAA type certification in late 1987. American Airlines placed the aircraft into revenue service in 1988, inaugurating a new era of efficient twin engine intercontinental operations. According to Britannica, the 767-300ER went on to become the most popular variant of the entire 767 family, accumulating 583 deliveries across its production run.
A pivotal factor in the 767-300ER's success was the evolution of ETOPS (Extended range Twin engine Operational Performance Standards) regulations. In February 1985, the FAA issued Advisory Circular AC 120-42, permitting qualified twin engine aircraft to fly routes up to 120 minutes from a suitable diversion airport. TWA operated the first ETOPS transatlantic crossing with a 767 on the Boston to Paris route that same year. The FAA extended this limit to 180 minutes in 1989, opening virtually all oceanic routes to twin engine aircraft. The 767-300ER, with its design reliability, robust engine options, and extended fuel reserves, became the aircraft of choice for carriers expanding into transoceanic markets. In November 2001, Hawaiian Airlines received direct ETOPS 180 approval for its 767-300ER fleet, marking the first time the FAA granted such approval to an airline without prior ETOPS experience. This pioneering role in ETOPS history helped reshape how airlines across Europe and worldwide structured their long haul fleets, replacing older trijets with more economical twinjets.
What Distinguishes the 767-300ER from Other 767 Variants
The 767-300ER shares its external fuselage dimensions with the standard 767-300, making visual identification difficult without checking the aircraft registration. The key differences are structural and performance related. Compared to the baseline 767-300, which has a maximum takeoff weight (MTOW) of approximately 159,000 to 172,365 kg (350,000 to 380,000 lb) and a range of roughly 4,200 nmi (7,800 km), the 767-300ER features a substantially reinforced airframe, additional fuel tankage including a centre section tank, and an MTOW of up to 186,880 kg (412,000 lb). This gives it a design range of approximately 5,990 nautical miles (11,090 km), sufficient for nonstop services across the North Atlantic and many transpacific segments.
Three high bypass turbofan engine families were offered on the 767-300ER, providing airlines with flexibility and commonality with other fleet types such as the Boeing 747-400:
- General Electric CF6-80C2 series (variants including CF6-80C2B6 and CF6-80C2B7F1), producing approximately 60,000 to 63,500 lbf of thrust
- Pratt & Whitney PW4000-94 series, producing up to approximately 62,000 lbf of thrust
- Rolls-Royce RB211-524G/H, producing approximately 60,000 lbf of thrust
- Fuel capacity of 24,140 US gallons (91,370 litres), shared with the 767-200ER and significantly greater than the standard 767-300
- MTOW up to 186,880 kg (412,000 lb), compared to approximately 159,000 to 172,365 kg for the standard 767-300
- Three exit door configurations available, with the large forward cargo door standard on the ER variant
- ETOPS 180 certified across all engine options, enabling unrestricted oceanic operations
The 767-300ER also served as the structural basis for the 767-300F freighter, which features a strengthened cabin floor, a large main deck cargo door, and no passenger windows. The later 767-400ER, launched in November 1995 with first flight in October 1999, introduced a further 6.4 m fuselage stretch and a higher MTOW of 204,110 kg (450,000 lb), but attracted only 38 deliveries compared to the 300ER's 583, underscoring the enduring market fit of the 767-300ER for medium capacity, long range operations.

A Delta Air Lines Boeing 767-332 aircraft is captured in flight against a clear blue sky. The airplane, featuring the airline's livery, showcases the twin engines and distinctive tail design.
Boeing 767-300ER Technical Specifications, Systems and Engine Options
The Boeing 767-300ER was designed as an extended range derivative of the 767-300, sharing the same fuselage stretch over the baseline 767-200 but adding significantly more fuel capacity and a higher maximum takeoff weight. Its core mission is medium to long haul international operations, typically on transatlantic and transpacific routes, where the twin engine widebody layout offers a favourable balance between payload, range and operating economics. The airframe retains the 767 family's 47.57 m wingspan, 283.3 m² wing area and 31.5° quarter chord sweep, paired with a widebody fuselage that seats between 218 (typical two class) and 351 passengers depending on cabin configuration. The ER variant, in service since 1988, was the most commercially successful member of the 767 family, with over 580 delivered.
Compared with the standard 767-300, the key engineering trade off in the ER is range versus structural weight. Additional fuel tankage in the centre wing section raises total usable fuel capacity from 16,700 US gallons to approximately 24,140 US gallons, while MTOW increases to 186,880 kg (412,000 lb). This enables a manufacturer quoted range of up to 5,990 to 6,590 nautical miles with a typical passenger load, although real world range depends heavily on payload, atmospheric conditions and operator weight options. The type was instrumental in expanding ETOPS operations across ocean routes, with many operators achieving 180 minute ETOPS approval. For those interested in how different aircraft types compare in regional and commuter roles, the BAe Jetstream 32 provides an interesting contrast as a turboprop designed for much shorter sectors.
- Overall length: 54.94 m (180 ft 3 in)
- Wingspan: 47.57 m (156 ft 1 in), no winglets on the original design
- Height: 15.85 m (52 ft 0 in)
- Wing area: 283.3 m² (3,050 sq ft), 31.5° sweep at quarter chord
- Fuselage external width: 5.03 m (16 ft 6 in); cabin width approximately 4.72 m
- MTOW: 186,880 kg (412,000 lb)
- OEW: approximately 90,010 kg (198,440 lb), varies by engine and configuration
- MLW: approximately 140,160 kg (309,000 lb)
- Fuel capacity: approximately 24,140 US gallons (91,380 litres) usable
- Range: up to approximately 5,990 to 6,590 nmi with typical two class payload (varies by engine, weight options and mission rules)
- Typical cruise speed: Mach 0.80 (long range cruise); MMO Mach 0.86
- Engines: two high bypass turbofans: Pratt & Whitney PW4060/PW4062, General Electric CF6-80C2B6/B7F, or Rolls-Royce RB211-524H
- Thrust class: 60,000 to 63,300 lbf (267 to 282 kN) per engine depending on variant
- Avionics: two crew glass cockpit with six Rockwell Collins CRT displays (EFIS and EICAS), dual FMS, CAT IIIb autoland capable
- Passenger capacity: 218 (typical two class) to 351 (high density single class)
Systems, Flight Controls and Onboard Technology
The 767-300ER uses a conventional hydraulic flight control architecture, not fly by wire. Primary flight surfaces, including ailerons, elevators and rudder, are powered by three independent hydraulic systems (left, centre and right), each pressurised to 3,000 psi. Spoilers are used for roll augmentation, speed braking and ground lift dumping. High lift devices include leading edge slats and trailing edge flaps. The variable incidence horizontal stabiliser provides pitch trim and is also hydraulically actuated. A yaw damper system, powered by the left and right hydraulic circuits, counters Dutch roll tendencies at cruise altitude, while a rudder ratio changer reduces rudder authority at higher speeds for handling safety.
In the event of multiple hydraulic failures, a ram air turbine (RAT) deploys automatically to provide emergency hydraulic power to the centre system. The flight deck integrates a dual Flight Management System (FMS), an Engine Indication and Crew Alerting System (EICAS) on two dedicated CRT screens, and four EFIS displays for primary flight and navigation data. This cockpit design, shared with the Boeing 757, enables a common type rating between the two aircraft. The autobrake system integrates with air/ground logic sensors for consistent deceleration on landing. Carbon brakes and anti skid protection are standard on most operator configurations.
Published performance numbers for the 767-300ER can vary significantly between sources. Differences arise from operator selected MTOW options, cabin density and associated operating empty weight, engine variant installed, atmospheric assumptions (ISA versus hot and high conditions), and runway surface state. Range figures, for example, are sensitive to payload: a full economy cabin will yield a shorter range than a lighter two class layout. Takeoff and landing field lengths also depend on airport elevation, temperature and flap setting. When comparing specifications, it is important to note the basis and context behind each figure rather than treating any single number as absolute.
Engine Options: CF6, PW4000 and RB211
The Boeing 767-300ER offers three engine families, giving operators the flexibility to select based on fleet commonality, maintenance infrastructure and regional preferences. The General Electric CF6-80C2 was the most popular choice on the 767-300ER. This high bypass turbofan, developed in the early 1980s from the earlier CF6-80A and CF6-50 core, entered service in 1985 on the Airbus A300-600. In the 767-300ER application, the CF6-80C2B6 produces approximately 60,000 lbf of thrust, while the CF6-80C2B7F is rated at up to 63,500 lbf (282 kN). The engine features a 93 inch fan, a bypass ratio of approximately 5.3:1 and an overall pressure ratio of around 31 to 33:1. Beyond the 767, the CF6-80C2 family has powered the Boeing 747-400, Airbus A300-600, Airbus A310, MD-11 and the military C-5M Super Galaxy, making it one of the most widely installed widebody engines in aviation history.
The Pratt & Whitney PW4000-94 series was the second major option. The PW4060, rated at 60,000 lbf (266.9 kN), and the higher thrust PW4062 at approximately 63,000 lbf (281.6 kN), both feature a 94 inch diameter fan and a bypass ratio of approximately 5 to 1. Developed as a successor to the JT9D, the PW4000-94 family also powers versions of the Boeing 747-400 and the Airbus A300-600. Larger fan diameter variants of the PW4000 family (100 inch and 112 inch) later went on to power the Airbus A330 and Boeing 777 respectively.
The Rolls-Royce RB211-524H was the third certified engine for the 767-300ER, rated at approximately 60,600 lbf (270 kN). Part of the broader RB211-524 family, it features a wide chord fan blade design and a bypass ratio of approximately 4.8 to 1. The RB211-524 series also powered selected Boeing 747-400 and Lockheed L-1011 TriStar variants. While fewer 767-300ER operators chose the Rolls-Royce option compared to GE or Pratt & Whitney, it remained a competitive alternative valued for its fuel efficiency improvements over earlier RB211 variants.
Boeing 767 Variants Comparison: 767-300ER vs 767-300 vs 767-200ER vs 767-400ER
Scroll horizontally to see more →
| Parameter | Boeing 767-300ER | Boeing 767-300 | Boeing 767-200ER | Boeing 767-400ER |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Entry into service | 1988 | 1986 | 1984 | 2000 |
| Engines | 2 × GE CF6-80C2 / PW4000 / RR RB211-524G | 2 × GE CF6-80 / PW JT9D / RR RB211-524 | 2 × GE CF6-80C2 / PW4000 / RR RB211-524G | 2 × GE CF6-80C2 / PW4000 / RR RB211-E4 |
| Length | 54.9 m | 54.9 m | 48.5 m | 61.4 m |
| Wingspan | 47.6 m | 47.6 m | 47.6 m | 52.5 m |
| Height | 15.9 m | 15.9 m | 15.9 m | 15.9 m |
| Typical seating and layout | 3-class: 210–260 passengers | 3-class: 240–280 passengers | 3-class: 180–220 passengers | 3-class: 280–320 passengers |
| MTOW | 187 t | 163 t | 175 t | 204 t |
| Range | 6,300 nm | 4,200 nm | 6,600 nm | 7,300 nm |
| Cruise speed | 0.80 Mach | 0.80 Mach | 0.80 Mach | 0.80 Mach |
| Service ceiling | 43,100 ft | 43,100 ft | 43,100 ft | 43,100 ft |
| Program note | Extended range version of stretched 767-300 with increased fuel and MTOW for long-haul operations | Stretched baseline version of 767-200 for medium-long haul routes | Original extended range version of baseline 767-200 for transatlantic and long-haul | Advanced stretched final 767 variant with raked wingtips and improved aerodynamics |
Scroll horizontally to see more →
The table compares key specifications across four Boeing 767 variants, highlighting how size and performance change with each model. The 767-400ER is the longest with the widest wingspan and highest MTOW, while the 767-200ER is shorter but offers strong long-range capability. The 767-300 is a baseline stretch with notably shorter range than the ER versions, and the 767-300ER adds fuel/MTOW for long-haul missions.
Boeing 767-300ER Operations: Typical Routes, Missions and Airlines Worldwide
The Boeing 767-300ER is a medium to long range widebody airliner that entered service in 1988, designed to cover sectors between 3,000 and 5,980 nautical miles (approximately 11,070 km). With ETOPS 180 certification, the type became the first twin engine aircraft cleared for extended overwater crossings, opening transatlantic routes previously reserved for three and four engine jets. Typical missions include transatlantic flights of 6 to 9 hours, transcontinental segments of 5 to 6 hours, and medium haul services of 3 to 5 hours connecting major hubs to secondary international destinations.
Airlines operating the Boeing 767-300ER typically achieve between 10 and 14 block hours of daily utilisation on long haul networks. On high frequency transatlantic pairings, the aircraft can complete a round trip between North America and Europe within a single crew duty period, making it well suited for hub and spoke operations from large gateways such as New York JFK, Atlanta, Tokyo Narita and Vienna. In point to point networks it also proves effective, connecting secondary city pairs that cannot fill larger widebodies like the Boeing 777 or Airbus A350.
The main operational challenges facing Boeing 767-300ER operators today include rising maintenance costs on airframes averaging 25 to 35 years of age, increasing difficulty sourcing spare parts for older avionics and systems, and higher fuel consumption compared to current generation replacements such as the Boeing 787 Dreamliner or Airbus A330neo. Several carriers, including Condor and TUI Airways, have already retired their fleets in favour of more efficient alternatives. Despite these pressures, the type remains economically viable on thinner long haul routes where its capacity of 200 to 260 seats matches demand without the cost of a larger aircraft.
Where the Boeing 767-300ER Operates Around the World
The Boeing 767-300ER continues to serve airlines across Europe, North America, South America, Asia and, to a lesser extent, Africa. In North America, the type remains a backbone of transatlantic and transcontinental flying, while in Asia it supports both international long haul and high frequency domestic trunk routes. European operators use it primarily for leisure and long haul scheduled services, and in Africa it appears mainly in cargo configuration. Pilot working conditions and airline operations vary widely among these carriers; for a closer look at how airlines manage crew scheduling and lifestyle, see this overview of airline pilot conditions.
- North America: Delta Air Lines operates the largest passenger Boeing 767-300ER fleet in the world, deploying the type on transatlantic routes from Atlanta and New York JFK to destinations across Europe, as well as on premium transcontinental services. United Airlines uses the aircraft on similar international routes from its Newark and Washington Dulles hubs, though it plans to phase the type out as Boeing 787 deliveries continue. Air Canada reintroduced two Boeing 767-300ER aircraft into passenger service in early 2025, operating from Toronto to leisure destinations including Las Vegas and Montego Bay, while also using converted freighter variants for cargo. Numerous cargo operators in the region, including Amazon Air (via Atlas Air and ABX Air), rely heavily on 767-300 freighter conversions for overnight parcel sorting networks.
- Europe: Austrian Airlines operates three Boeing 767-300ER aircraft on long haul routes from Vienna to destinations in North America and Asia. Icelandair uses the type to connect Reykjavik Keflavik with cities in North America and Europe via its one stop transatlantic model. euroAtlantic Airways in Portugal operates the aircraft on ACMI wet lease and charter missions. On the cargo side, DHL Aviation is a major operator of converted 767-300 freighters across the continent.
- Asia: All Nippon Airways (ANA) flies a fleet of 15 Boeing 767-300ER aircraft on both international routes and high frequency Japanese domestic trunk services. Japan Airlines similarly uses the type on medium and long haul international sectors. Air Astana operates three aircraft connecting Astana and Almaty with European hubs such as Frankfurt and London. MIAT Mongolian Airlines uses the Boeing 767-300ER for its limited long haul network connecting Ulaanbaatar with destinations in Asia and Europe.
- Africa: Active passenger operations of the Boeing 767-300ER on the continent are limited. Ethiopian Airlines historically operated the type on passenger and cargo routes but has largely transitioned to newer fleets. Aeronexus in South Africa is listed among current operators, primarily for charter and VIP services.
Typical Seating Configurations on the Boeing 767-300ER
Seating capacity on the Boeing 767-300ER varies significantly depending on the operator and mission profile, generally ranging from about 200 seats in a premium heavy layout to 280 or more in a high density charter arrangement. The aircraft features a 2 3 2 cross section in economy, which avoids middle middle seats and is widely appreciated by passengers.
Network carriers favour two or three class cabins with generous premium space. Delta Air Lines configures its fleet in several variants: a common layout offers 26 lie flat Delta One seats, 18 Premium Select seats and 172 economy seats for a total of 216, while a premium heavy version features 36 Delta One suites, 32 Comfort+ seats and 143 economy seats totalling 211. United Airlines offers 203 seats in a three class layout of 30 Polaris business, 24 Premium Plus and 149 economy. ANA configures its international Boeing 767-300ER with 35 business class and 167 economy seats for 202 total, while a denser domestic version can carry up to 270 passengers.
Leisure and charter operators typically maximise seat count with a single or two class cabin, pushing totals above 250. Austrian Airlines and Icelandair sit between these extremes, offering two class configurations adapted to their route networks. Across all operators, economy seat pitch typically ranges from 31 to 33 inches, while business class products vary from angled lie flat cradle seats to fully flat suites depending on the airline and the age of the cabin retrofit.
In this video, learn why Delta Air Lines is retiring its Boeing 767-300ER fleet, exploring the key factors behind the decision and what it means for operations, routes, and future aircraft plans.
Boeing 767-300ER Safety Record: How Safe Is This Widebody Twinjet?
The Boeing 767-300ER has been flying revenue services since 1988, making it one of the longest serving widebody twinjets in commercial aviation. With 583 airframes delivered and decades of continuous operations across dozens of airlines worldwide, this extended range variant has accumulated millions of flight hours and departure cycles. Across the entire Boeing 767 programme, which totals 1,357 deliveries as of early 2026, the Aviation Safety Network records 67 aviation occurrences, 19 hull losses and 11 fatal accidents. When narrowed down to the 767-300ER sub variant specifically, the number of hull loss events is remarkably small: only three confirmed hull losses over nearly four decades of operation. The broader 767 family carries a fatal accident rate of roughly 0.28 per million flights, a figure that compares favourably with older generation widebodies and reflects the type's mature and well understood design.
Major Accidents and Incidents Involving the Boeing 767-300ER
The most significant accident in 767-300ER history remains Lauda Air Flight 004. On 26 May 1991, a 767-300ER (registration OE-LAV) powered by Pratt & Whitney PW4060 engines experienced an uncommanded in flight deployment of the left engine thrust reverser during climb out of Bangkok, Thailand. The asymmetric disruption of airflow caused an aerodynamic stall and a rapid, unrecoverable dive. All 223 people on board perished. The Thai Aircraft Accident Investigation Committee identified the uncommanded thrust reverser deployment as the probable cause. In response, the FAA issued airworthiness directives mandating hardware modifications across all Boeing widebodies equipped with similar thrust reverser systems. Boeing and Pratt & Whitney redesigned the reverser stowage locks and added a mechanical "sink lock" mechanism that physically prevents deployment unless the main landing gear sensors detect ground contact. These changes remain a cornerstone of modern thrust reverser safety architecture on all subsequent Boeing twinjets.
On 31 October 1999, EgyptAir Flight 990, a Boeing 767-366ER (registration SU-GAP), departed New York JFK for Cairo and crashed into the Atlantic Ocean approximately 100 km south of Nantucket Island, killing all 217 people on board. The NTSB investigation concluded in March 2002 that the crash resulted from deliberate flight control inputs by the relief first officer. No mechanical failure or structural deficiency was found in the aircraft. The Egyptian Civil Aviation Authority disputed those conclusions, suggesting a possible elevator system malfunction. Regardless of the differing interpretations, the accident reinforced industry wide focus on cockpit resource management, crew monitoring protocols and mental health screening for flight crew. No design modifications to the 767 were mandated as a result.
A third hull loss occurred on 28 October 2016 when American Airlines Flight 383, a 767-300ER (registration N345AN), suffered an uncontained failure of the right engine (General Electric CF6-80C2) during the takeoff roll at Chicago O'Hare. The crew successfully rejected the takeoff and all 170 occupants evacuated, with 21 sustaining minor injuries and no fatalities. The FAA subsequently issued airworthiness directives requiring enhanced inspection intervals for CF6-80C2 engine components and reinforcing nacelle fire detection and suppression standards.
How Safe Is the Boeing 767-300ER Today?
When evaluating safety, context matters. Three hull losses across 583 delivered airframes and millions of completed flights over 37 years represents a very low incident rate by any measure. The 767-300ER benefits from a design philosophy rooted in structural redundancy, dual engine reliability and conservative certification standards. Operators follow ICAO compliant standard operating procedures, and the type is subject to ongoing airworthiness oversight by regulators including the FAA and EASA. Continuous fleet monitoring programmes, mandatory service bulletins and evolving pilot training and assessment standards ensure that lessons from past events are embedded into everyday operations. The 767-300ER also played a pioneering role in ETOPS (Extended range Twin engine Operations Performance Standards) certification, which itself demanded stringent reliability thresholds before twin engine aircraft could fly long overwater routes.
According to Boeing's Statistical Summary of Commercial Jet Airplane Accidents, the global commercial aviation industry has seen a significant decline in both total and fatal accident rates over the past two decades, even as passenger traffic has reached record highs. The Boeing 767's record fits well within that improving trend. While no aircraft type can claim a perfectly incident free history, the data confirms that the 767-300ER is a safe and well proven platform. As regulators, manufacturers and airlines continue to collaborate, commercial aviation remains statistically one of the safest modes of transport available.
01 What is the typical range and mission profile of the Boeing 767-300ER?
The Boeing 767-300ER has a maximum range of about 5,990 nautical miles, making it ideal for long-haul transatlantic and transpacific flights. Airlines use it for routes like New York to London or Los Angeles to Tokyo, carrying 200-260 passengers in typical three-class configurations. Its extended-range tanks and efficient engines support nonstop flights over 12 hours.
02 What are common cabin layouts and passenger comfort features on the Boeing 767-300ER?
Most Boeing 767-300ERs feature a twin-aisle cabin with economy, premium economy, and business class sections, seating 218-264 passengers. Passengers note quieter cabins due to advanced engine technology and larger windows for better views. Comfort varies by airline, but many offer lie-flat seats in business class and improved noise insulation throughout.
03 Which airlines operate the Boeing 767-300ER and on what routes?
Airlines like Delta, United, American Airlines, and cargo operators such as FedEx and UPS fly the Boeing 767-300ER extensively. Passenger versions serve transcontinental US routes and international long-haul flights to Europe and Asia, while freighters handle global cargo networks. It remains popular for its reliability on medium-to-long routes up to 6,000 miles.
04 How does the Boeing 767-300ER perform in fuel efficiency compared to similar aircraft?
The Boeing 767-300ER offers good fuel efficiency for its era, burning about 5-6 tons of fuel per hour with CF6 or PW4000 engines, better than older trijets. It compares favorably to the Airbus A330-200 on similar missions but lags behind newer twins like the 787 due to older technology. Retrofitted versions with winglets improve efficiency by 3-5%.
05 What is the safety record of the Boeing 767-300ER?
The Boeing 767-300ER has an excellent safety record, with no fatal hull-loss accidents directly attributed to design flaws since entering service in 1988. Key safety features include reinforced structure, redundant systems, and ETOPS certification for twin-engine overwater flights. Its overall 767 family hull-loss rate is among the lowest for widebodies, at under 0.5 per million departures.
06 What should passengers know about seats, windows, and turbulence on the Boeing 767-300ER?
On the Boeing 767-300ER, window seats in economy rows like 11A or 22A offer unobstructed views due to larger-than-average windows. Upper deck seats if configured provide a quieter ride away from engines. The widebody design and low wing placement result in smooth handling of turbulence, often feeling less bumpy than narrowbodies.










